Bendel v. B.M.W. Entertainment Services, Inc.
This text of 343 S.W.3d 361 (Bendel v. B.M.W. Entertainment Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Robert Bendel (“Claimant”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) disqualifying Claimant from unemployment benefits. Claimant asserts the Commission erred in finding he was disqualified because there was no substantial and competent evidence in the record to warrant disqualification based on misconduct.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
343 S.W.3d 361, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 715, 2011 WL 2039397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bendel-v-bmw-entertainment-services-inc-moctapp-2011.