Bende v. McLaughlin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bende v. McLaughlin

448 So. 2d 1146, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12611

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 11, 1984

DocketNos. 83-567, 83-1434

StatusPublished

This text of 448 So. 2d 1146 (Bende v. McLaughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bende v. McLaughlin, 448 So. 2d 1146, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12611 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This was an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of land. Defendant prevailed and was awarded attorney’s fees. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

As to attorney’s fees, we affirm upon authority of Sousa v. Palumbo, 426 So.2d 1072 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). We acknowledge that a contra view is expressed in Leitman v. Boone, 439 So.2d 318 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Thus, the two cases are in conflict.

AFFIRMED.

HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., and NORRIS, WILLIAM A., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI