Bende v. McLaughlin

448 So. 2d 1146, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12611
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 11, 1984·No. Nos. 83-567, 83-1434·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This was an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of land. Defendant prevailed and was awarded attorney’s fees. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

As to attorney’s fees, we affirm upon authority of Sousa v. Palumbo, 426 So.2d 1072 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). We acknowledge that a contra view is expressed in Leitman v. Boone, 439 So.2d 318 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Thus, the two cases are in conflict.

AFFIRMED.

HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., and NORRIS, WILLIAM A., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bende v. McLaughlin, 448 So. 2d 1146, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12611 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

448 So. 2d 1146 (Bende v. McLaughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leitman v. Boone
439 So. 2d 318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Sousa v. Palumbo
426 So. 2d 1072 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)