Bencomo v. County of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 4, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-00440·Unknown

Opinion

Mark E. Merin (State Bar No. 043849) Paul H. Masuhara (State Bar No. 289805) LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN 3 1010 F Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, California 95814 4|| Telephone: (916) 443-6911 Facsimile: (916) 447-8336 5 || E-Mail: mark @ markmerin.com 6 paul @markmerin.com 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff MANUEL BENCOMO 8 9|\|\PORTER SCOTT 10 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494 11 || cfessenden @ porterscott.com Suli A. Mastorakos, SBN 330383 12 || smastorakos @ porterscott.com 2180 Harvard Street, Suite 500 13 Sacramento, California 95815 14 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 15 Attorneys for Defendants 16 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 17)! DEPARTMENT, SCOTT JONES, and 18 MATHEW MORENO 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 22 || MANUEL BENCOMO, Case No. 2:23-cv-0440-DAD-JDP 23 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER vs RE: PERSONNEL FILES; IFPROPOSED] ORDER 25 || COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 26 Defendants. 27 28

1 STIPULATION 2 A. PURPOSE AND LIMITATION 3 Defendants believe that the disclosure and discovery activity concerning the materials described 4 in this stipulated protective order is likely to involve production of information for which protection from 5 public disclosure would be warranted. Plaintiff has not been permitted to view the materials described in 6 this stipulated protective order. The parties acknowledge that this protective order does not confer 7 blanket protections on all disclosures or discovery activity, and that the protection it affords extends only 8 to the limited information or items that are entitled to such protection under Federal Rule of Civil 9 Procedure 26(c). The parties further acknowledge that this stipulated protective order does not entitle any 10 party to file information designated as protected or confidential under seal, where Local Rule 141 sets 11 forth the procedures that must be followed and reflects the standards that will be applied when a party 12 seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. 13 B. DEFINITIONS 14 The following definitions shall apply to this Protective Order: 15 1. The “Action” shall mean and refer to the above-captioned matter and to all actions now or 16 later consolidated with the Action, and any appeal from the Action and from any other action 17 consolidated at any time under the above-captioned matter, through final judgment. 18 2. “Documents” or “Confidential Documents” shall mean the documents that Defendants 19 designate as “Confidential” and described in section C. 20 3. “Confidential” shall mean information designated “Confidential” pursuant to this 21 stipulated protective order. Information designated “Confidential” shall be information that is determined 22 in good faith by the attorneys representing the designating party to be subject to protection pursuant to 23 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). Confidential documents, material, and/or information shall be 24 used solely for purposes of litigation. Confidential information shall not be used by the non-designating 25 party for any business or other purpose, unless agreed to in writing by all parties to this action or as 26 authorized by further order of the Court. 27 4. “Defendants” shall mean the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO 28 COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, SCOTT JONES, and MATHEW MORENO. 1 5. “Plaintiff” shall mean MANUEL BENCOMO. 2 6. “Parties” shall mean Plaintiff and Defendants, identified above. 3 C. INFORMATION COVERED 4 Covered Information: 5 Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(c)(1), a description of the information eligible for protection under 6 this stipulated protective order is limited to the following: 7 1. Personnel Files of Mathew Moreno: 8 i. Employment Records 9 1. Mathew Moreno Deputy Sheriff Appointment (DEF 02085) 2. Department Seniority Determination Worksheet (DEF 02086) 10 3. New Employee Masterfile New Hire (DEF 02383) 11 4. Class/Status Change Masterfile Promotion (DEF 02087) 12 5. Notice of Appointment/Termination (DEF 02088) 13 6. Email authorizing Dep. Moreno to receive K9 stipend (DEF 02089) 14 7. Employment Uniform Expense Documents (DEF 02094 – 02100, 02363 – 15 02366) 8. Sac County Employees’ Retirement System Correspondence (DEF 02106 - 16 02109 17 9. DMV Request for Confidentiality of Home Address (DEF 02115) 18 10. Subpoena Assignment Receipts (DEF 02125, 02174, 02178, 02182, 02190, 19 02194, 02196, 02221, 02236 – 02237, 02245, 02266, 02268 – 02269, 20 02285 – 02286, 02319, 02322, 02329, 02358, 02370, 02372, 02376, 02380, 21 02398, 02404, 02429) 22 11. Discrimination and Sexual Harassment Employee Feedback Forms (DEF 02137, 02154, 02391) 23 12. Division Losing/Gaining Employee w/ Personnel Orders (DEF 02166 – 24 02170, 02416 - 02417) 25 13. SCSD Employee Status/History – Notices of Address Change (DEF 02195, 26 02296, 02308, 02328, 02331) 27 14. SCSD Employee Status/History – New Employee (DEF 02292) 28 15. SCSD Pre-Employment Releases and Waivers (DEF 02210, 02289) 1 16. SCSD Inter-Department Correspondence RE Field Training Officer 2 Appointment and Incentive Pay (DEF 02279) 17. Form I-9 Employment Eligibility Verifications (DEF 02309, 02340) 3 18. Non-Sworn Hiring Clearance Form (DEF 02334) 4 19. County of Sacramento Employment Statement Signed (DEF 02335) 5 20. County of Sacramento Last Warrant Designee (DEF 02336) 6 21. SCSD Section 15630 Welfare and Institutions Code Agreement Signed 7 (DEF 02338) 8 22. Employee Self-Identification Questionnaire (DEF 02339) 23. SCSD Use of Criminal Justice Information Compliance Agreement Signed 9 (DEF 02341 – 02342) 10 24. SCSD Work Schedule/Supervisor Change Requests (DEF 02378, 02409) 11 ii. Employee Time and Attendance Management 12 1. Absence Requests (DEF 02079, 02083 – 02084, 02093, 02104, 02110 – 13 02112, 02114, 02118 – 02119, 02122 – 02123, 02126, 02128, 02143, 14 02148 – 02150, 02164 – 02165, 02171, 02179 – 02180, 02185, 02187, 15 02191 – 021921, 2197, 02199 – 02200, 02202, 02207, 02209, 02211, 02217 – 02219, 02223, 02226 – 02227, 02230, 02234, 02244, 02255, 16 02260, 02263, 02270, 02274 – 02276, 02278, 02283, 02288, 02290, 02295, 17 02305 – 02306, 02313 – 02314, 02325, 02327, 02330, 02343 – 02344, 18 02346, 02349, 02353 – 02354, 02359, 02373, 02375, 02379, 02381 – 19 02382, 02394, 02410, 02418, 02427, 02433 – 02435, 02438 – 02439) 20 2. Employee Time Sheet Correction Forms (DEF 02090, 02172, 02176, 21 02184, 02186, 02188, 02201, 02203, 02205, 02208, 02220, 02228, 02235, 02246, 02273, 02281, 02315, 02320, 02324, 02357, 02367, 02374, 02403, 22 02431, 02437) 23 3. Records of Overtime Worked (DEF 02091 – 02092, 02105, 02113, 02116 24 – 02117, 02120 – 02121, 02129 – 02131, 02138 – 02139, 02141 – 02142, 25 02145, 02147, 02152, 02162 – 02163, 02173, 02177, 02181, 02183, 02189, 26 02193, 02198, 02204, 02206, 02222, 02224, 02229, 02231 – 02233, 02238 27 – 02243, 02247, 02256 – 02259, 02261 – 02262, 02264 – 02265, 02282, 02284, 02287, 02293 – 02294, 02302 – 02304, 02311 – 02312, 02316 – 28 1 02318, 02321, 02323, 02326, 02345, 02347 – 02348, 02351 – 02352, 2 02355 – 02356, 02361 – 02362, 02368 – 02369, 02371, 02377, 02389 – 02390, 02393, 02395, 02397, 02399 – 02400, 02405 – 02407, 02420 – 3 02425, 02428, 02432) 4 4. Cross Application Timesheets (DEF 02080 – 02082, 02127, 02151, 02153, 5 02175, 02225, 02267, 02272, 02277, 02280, 02291, 02307, 02350, 02360, 6 02396, 02401 – 02402) 7 5. Request for Parental Leave (DEF 02101 – 02103) 8 iii. Payroll/Wages 1. Fax to Sac County from Vendor Services RE Verification of Mathew 9 Moreno Employment & Salary (DEF 02297) 10 2. Request for Verification of Employment (DEF 02298 – 02299) 11 3. Authorization to Obtain and Release Credit Information (DEF 02300) 12 4. County of Sacramento Payroll History Information (03/2015) (DEF 02301) 13 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bencomo v. County of Sacramento, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Bencomo v. County of Sacramento (Bencomo v. County of Sacramento) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Or.
661 F.3d 417 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
785 F.2d 1108 (Third Circuit, 1986)