Benbow v. Caudle
108 S.E.2d 663, 250 N.C. 371, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 668
Opinion
Plaintiff’s evidence when considered in the light most favorable to him fails to make out a prima facie case of malicious abuse of process in accordance with the controlling principles laid down in Barnette v. Woody, 242 N.C. 424, 431, 88 S.E. 2d 223. There is no evidence of abuse or misuse of the execution after its issuance. The judgment below is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Benbow v. Caudle, 108 S.E.2d 663, 250 N.C. 371, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 668 (N.C. 1959).
108 S.E.2d 663 (Benbow v. Caudle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Koury v. John Meyer of Norwich
261 S.E.2d 217 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
Petrou v. Hale
260 S.E.2d 130 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)