Benavides v. Mitchell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6012

EDUARDO BENAVIDES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MARY MITCHELL, Warden,

Respondent – Appellee,

and

HARLEY LAPPIN, Director for Bureau of Prisons,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (2:09-cv-02798-JFA)

Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 24, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eduardo Benavides, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Eduardo Benavides, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s orders denying his motions to reconsider the

court’s denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Benavides v. Mitchell,

No. 2:09-cv-02798-JFA (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 2010, Oct. 22, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED