Benavides, Joe Trampas

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: January 8, 2015
• Docket: WR-76,987-03
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF Cfclttlis/AL AWEALS OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN/ TEXAS MQTK , , DATE: U&l )<; BY: ft're JOE 7PJWAS ^EMAVI\^ES Trial (W Mo^^^HOV^W Tbcj-ib No.oi&\acm HeWW/ \vlR-"76,03 V.

COutlT OF bALLAS, DALLAS JA® 08 2Q1$ COUMTV TEXAS AbeMcoste, C/eric

MOTION FOK ANAmAL^>OHV

WSOANT TO TEXAS CObE CRIMINAL WlXEfcURE AMN. A«X 44.04

COnES NOWI, JOE TRAWAS ^EVviAVX^Sj^d Wes +he Courij \wsuCma\ -Vo Tex.CocU (W.Vroc. Avmo. ^.^4.04j +o reccesJ- \M Oa\\ tc sel. ~^i!i 'WoViaA is oased up

\. 0\a vIaAu.(\vr\A ^(oj 3000 \ir\e. K.eWW p\ed a^Uru Vd tkAwor^ o^ a CovnWW Su^sW^ce. 'v\ Ccx^l l\lo. E^V3nO

o? ex CowtaoWea SuWtaAAce., Xnlttnt to Deliver'. Cocaine in Case No,

F^-anio-vvi.

2. Thev^e. was a ^Wa \>a;fa<\\Y\ A<\rtav\ev\{ whev~e the. Relator was

ad^AcUcaYed cxva\\V\^ o? tW«. aUe oWe.\Ases.7nc delator's se/\+e*ct was cxsse-SSed tont ^0 uewrs \v\c&rc£raViD\A V\ Ca^e. Nio. F^^HO^ -WW

2 v^ears Ya Ca^^os.F°l°i^\108-W(x^l F^V3HI0-W,Ue WaWs se*- Vev\ces 'we*re suspended ow\d V\e_ was placed ow 5 ^ea\rs cowwviia\a»"Vv\ Supervision ccn^AoeAciAa o\a aa\AVACx\ra ^^>, 5000, 3. 1a Xvavn?, Q000, tW Sx\aW VioWW \yroWV\cv\ and Wc\s ^^AT

lTvaIv^ \4j 3000 and enclw August 31,3000. TWealW tta 5$e«rs reavA\ar ^robariOA was re'\ASTared . 4. Xa A^vasVj 3003. tW tle\aW vioWted. broWtiO/'i clue to.oi VUefl od\avAct-\oa V\ C^se. Nio.FOi-34613-W. 8.e\uW was senWced •Vo 30 fionth-s V\ TbCT- SVc^Vc Ja\\ m said case, cha NlcWe^b^r 1} 200^ as ^avrlr ot

\a Case Mo. F°i°l-3nOVWW. Sentenced to 30 ^tlns TbCJT- State

Jck'd 1a Cevse Nios, F^-SnOg-W and F°i°i-2niO-\A/ on floe same

dede. All caj.es to iru^i concurrent ajona wI-Ha Case Kio,F03-34

(o. On Hau Ik^OO'B) a V\ea.\r'ina was ne\d and delator was ^Wed oa 8 uears shock probaVlon. \n Case Mo. F4°i-3 H0^1-HV\), Said t)NfOOat\OA to Commence on t^au 10, 3003>, delator renamed Va CMsYodu due to 30 irwontUs m TbCJ-SFate Jcxil \v\ the o-tner

tWee. eases. Sulo^eauenVU ^released °^ Aprd S&^OO^ and actual ^Co^Menxe^en-T of oUock WobaFion ',* Case Mo, WOI1M-MW.

7. On MgutcIa 31, 3005 tke (leWW was cowto[ad ot SUbn<^ aAcl sentenced to ^ ^eairs lnca\rcefaV\on.CaSe M°^ FOS-OOOOGi-IW, 8. On I^Wcn 35;3005; <*. \adqevnent Was en^ed revoW'iAa tU ieWVoTS Snodc VW)aY>on -lv> Cas-t Mo, Pl°l-31104"^ |U K.e\aVo\r was SenVev\c<>d TO 10 uears \nca\rce\fatio>A. UttiAa tnjz.

S^Sf>ev\sion ot YUis sentence orlcynallw, InOosed on Ja^uaA/* 9-Wj 5000 as ^>arl- o£ or"»uned vWu bar&ain /Lree/vieinf, OiA twe sa/vie. c\au tvy-e tv'ial Couird uadded'' a. c^MiAlafiOn Order. Ordeal na thvs sentence, to fuv\ consecutive to Case Klo.FOS'OOOOS-XW, S.O^ YWcU 35^ 2005 Ike delator \-\led o, -/noW tW neW YvSod \v\ bo-\U cases. On Waroh 31; 300S tk^ ^offan ton new Vial w^s cveluded In boYU ceases, 10. On Ho\ie>\be\r Q, 3005 delator 4\\ed a noFice o( appeal. \\. Oa F«.Wwa^ 31,3001 Coarl of Appeals F'ttb \Vivlr\ct ot Texas aV "ballas A-?titled tbe Convictions In Doth C&seS. l2.4 UpoA enW\A& TbCiT oia Hxu, 8,3001 all se/denc&s we^e sIaowa Concurrent aAd Relator continued to serve 10 yea^r sen- Yence tV\ab was Wst banded down. 13. IVe to backfime Gredibs mot awarded correctly tbe \CeWYof Made requesK tWouab Tjrvie Cired it Slesolatlo^ uisnate and TbCJ-SYaFe Counsel For Offenders. Mob s^YaStied with tbe resvdts. \le\aFoY- tlVd Writ ot habeas Corpus tor tbe tntSsi'Acv baclcViAoe credits.

14. Iss^ne. was a^t coa^iT-able Oa babeas bub trial Court still awarded the. rewaivum Ored>ts and Case Nlo. F^-3110^- t^lW was obscbcxr^ed On dune 5, 30Q, On tbrs dat^ delator beaan &e.TviAc\ ^ena\A(W of ^ H^ar sentence In Case Kta.FOS-OOO^i-IW, 15. Klunt ^ro Yunc Yded \n Case Nlo. FO5-00OO°\ araui/ia Yor backFinn t Credds and Order aranted (Aarcb l&, 3013 .cbawcyna He\aW's re\e.ase date to AuaiAst 3^.30\1>.Oa |Ls date audit was

done oa KelaYot's Vile, and be was detained due to tne cuwula-

f\on order V\ Case Klo, F^VSllO^V^W, ileWYor \s Currently SefViAa remainder of 10 uea\T senYence as ftarf of \°\ ^ear SenYeAce. due bo CuvnulaYion Order runnlna tbis senYence con-

Sec^xflv/e to 4 ^ear sentence \v\ Case ^o. F05-00004 -iw. \(o. HeWW filed \Jr\\ of Ylabeas, Corpus \v\ Case l\lo. F44- 3HOVMW oa VWcb 6,30\4. 0a 'Ha^^aOiq Caurt of CrVnnod Appeals aenied witboat written order Ybe upplicaYlon Tor wnf of babeas Corpus on Ybe YiaA\^s of Ybe trial Court wltbout a beArlv^/ , 17. On fV^ 15,3014 WaYor fiUd YloV.on To Include PWlO" randuvn Tn SiAt^ort Of \dr\\ Of Ylabeas Corpus and Appella/d's Uepld^ To SYaYe's Response To A^pbcaYlon For Ur iY -Of tUbeas Corpus As Part Of Tbe Record For Review Of VJrlY Of Habeas Corpus. 3a\d nobion denied bu Court of CrVmlvvd Appeals Oa June 11,3014. 16, On June 34,^.014 sa'\Y was also filed bu Kelodrcr uj/^W ^o" 0-S.C. LStobon] ^^Sd^ Joe Trav^pas Ibewcwldes V. Wdbavn SYe^b en s, u\recW. VCivil Action No. 31N-cv-^^oY C^ Act*ova sVdl ^ev\d\n^ and ope/i, W. Oa June 35,3014, delator filed Motlov, To (W^lew Appellants Vmt Of Habeas Corpus Pursuant" To Texas Code OF CrivniAal rfoceduft Am.At\- 11.01 And IW Fourteenth Avnend- ^Cnb To The \dS. Constitution/ ^avcl Cotton denied b^ CourY of Cr\rV\na\ Appeals On Juli^ 8, 30|4. £0. On ^occe^Fer 15)3^4, delator bebeviina bie bad mo oYber adec|uatt SYcAc remedy aY bw; filed Oriainal Abdication For VJr'J Of ^AandurAvAS," 31. As Ybe Sole around, for Ybe instant ^etlfion, Ke\aYor usks YWs Court Yo eoASider wbeYber the Ke\ato\r is eligible For- (kv\ appeal bond a^rsuanb fo 7eX Code Crivn,rroc. Aaia.art. M4.04,

VJHFtlFFOtlF, \le\ator respect talla moves this Court fo oxanY a V/rlY of Habeas, Corpus, und bo\d a hearing Yo deY- ern'me bis eligibility tor an aps^l bon.d.

iLoAUflAnAJs) be TrovMAasloenavides, *lo/3093> CK.e\aFor] xeYitionef\ Clewe^t s Uni t 4G>0| Spur 541 A^arillo/Tc, 74101

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

X herebu CerYifu fbab a true and accurate Cop^ of the doreaolna has bee\A Sent bu Certified 05. f^ai | on \bis Ybe CM dau^ of iU^iAara 50 15 to the Wslclin^ Jud^e j3G>3rd Judicial Oistricf Court of ualUs County 7e*as, \V^> tvi. diver-front Hrd. 5fU Floor 3Dallas Texas ISSiol.-

/V Joe -?tra^ipas ^U T77 benav/iaeS tdeWfor/PeYltio^erN

17) IU THE COURT OF CRItniHAL ATOALS OF TEXAS AT AOSTIU TEXAS

JOE TRATOAS ^EMAVI^ES Trial Court islo.F^OlW-MW

SlebWl WR-76,481-03 (Va-Web") v.

?>G>2>rci OWLCIAL "frlSTRICT

COURT OF DALLAS, DALLAS

COOMTV 7FKAS ResponaanY. MWORA^W* XNi SUrVOfcT OF MOTION FOR AM AWEAL VNfc YURSUAMT TO TEXAS CObE CRIMINAL ?ROCEbUfcE AWiARWO^

Ped'tF'Noner rewcftwu^ subr^iYs tWf he is entitled fo bond ^encllna appeal ^ursManY bo 7eX. Code Crivn, Vroc. Ann.Art. 44.04. VeY'dioner requests that Ybe court- \ssue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, and find VvVrV eWble for bond. VeY'dloner also ^quests o\ bearlAQ

on V\ls c\alvns.

STATEMENT OF ISSUES

X. The ^cY'dioner \s enY'dWd do a reasonable appeal bond ^wdVio^ Ws appeal / VMV of fVandaynws. STATEMENT OF jORTStttCTIONl

Texas provides an oa/enue for rnatbecs perfatnlna to bail ^end'ma a^eab There are. Ynree means fo review bail pending aA a^eal'. Cft b\^ an appeal ^ur-suanY to Article 44.04 (aY) (2\ bi^ osteal from (x denial of writ of Y^abeas corpus pursuant do Arb\ele 44.3>6>> V.A.C.C.^.j or Co^bu an orialnal writ of habeas Corpus fo 4be CourY of CrWn\nal Appeals, Ex ^arYe S^auldivu^6l2 ^>Ai. 3d 504 (Tex.Cr.App.\48\\The 'Petitioner feds that hiS best o^ortunifu fo obtain faVr and substantial justice rejaraiv^ Wis bond pev\di\aa appeal Is fWouabi this peyifioi/\j us the procedural remeda" uVdlaed herein has historically s&v\itc\ as a safefa Aet for those who have had their coiflstlYuYional

flabYs violabed. A^GO^EHT

"Tbe VeY\Yioner brinaS Us clodvn before the court pursuant fo Tev:.CoieCr'iendincx the appeal from ana^ felonaCoAvicticn wbere the punishwefd equals or exceeds \0 aears coinYl aevnenYor where the defend- c\iaY V\d* beevn e-onviefed of an ofrense listed

(2\ uwder Section o^Cc^O^ ArYlcle 43.1^ but shall YfnmecbaYelu be placed 'in cuSToduand the ba'\\ dlscbaraei.

Tex/CodeCrim.W. An*, art. M4.04. See aUo Thomas v. StaYe^d S.W. Sd 401 (Tex.App.Corpus CbrisYl 3001\ Lebo v. StaYe^O SW~ 3d 3>34(TexXrw.App. W&YThe, ^Wn lan^ua^e of the sfafube In dicated C\ trial '^ud^e was ^roY\lb\Yed ffovn releas'mc^ a person on ba'A \^end\v\a ou^aeal ov\\\\ \f Wis punishment equaled or (exceeded Yen uears actual VnpnsonmenY) while those who are placed on ben uears Covnvnunit^ supervision rAxx^ seesk re\ea.se on WA ^endlna apoeal, Lebo, ^0 SMLod at ooO. Adefendant aayadvcaW au'df^ ot an offense \A^f\a^« CAN Secb\o\A 14.0^1, Venal Code Gnurder\ Qfi Section 14-OS, Venal Code (cqp"da\ Murder^ (C\, SecYlon ^\.l\ f^Cn J>enal Code(.'waecenaA with a child\ Cv^ SecY\on 30,04^ Venal Code (aaarasraYed \s\dnappV\a\j fe^ SecYv\on 33.02} \)enal Code Caaafa/cded: sexual assaulY>F OF^ SecY^on 34.0^ \Vna\Code Caaaravated robber^; (CVn ^>ecY\on 481^ Cbea\Yn and SateY^ Code\ of tVh S*cA"«ov\ ;&.0l\> \>ena\ Code ise*ua\ a^saul^ ina.v\ not be released on bad pursuant to 7ex.Code Cmi/^.^roc. Am, ArY. mbCC 4Co)Cx\G\. See also SkWwr v. Sktt^OOl Tey.App. Lexis U"s5 (Tex.App.TexarkanaY A denial of a. defendant's request Yor an appeal bond upon rev/ocablon of his deferred ad.^uchc- adlon Comnun\W Supervision following co/wlcYion tor aaarava\ed Sexual assault was appropriate because under Tex.Code cYin.Vroc. AAA.art. 44.04(b\ a defendant who had been convicted of an Offense under TeK., Code CrWn.\Voc.Ann. art. 43.Qy Ca^aYC) could not be released on bad 'penchna appeal Id, lebdtoner now asserts that Ybe ivnposlfion of a Yen year SCndence as a result oh \do\cd*on for an wvaWidual w/bo was placed On eiaWY ^AearS of ^shoclc probat\o/\u exceeds Ybe Wi^Yb of scarce- rutlon.The YeY\Y\oner Subnets thab he i^ entitled to a Reasonable bond Weause fWre \S no ofufuW^ basis or Waal cause do deiaui hlvn ball, Accord\v\aW, Ybe cWiVns taised below ate aoW

properly before this Coutd. The VebiYioner Yherefore respecYfuWi^ TeoiuesYs YbaY Ybe Court bear Ybe claims ftesenled m Ws notion and this vV*a ora\ndufn of Law.

I. THE VETITIOHER IS E^TITUb TO A RFASONAME Wfc

Tbe VeYiYioner subwViFo YhaV because he aefvAcdl^ be^an serving ex worY\on of Us Yen uear senYence( he wouWl be entitled W> boni ^end\na appeal, Conwcted felons are not Guaranteed the riabY Yo bad under the Texas Constitution, lex. Const, art he lb The legislature Was,however, CreaYed a CiaVit to bad pend'ma an appeal. Tex.CodeCWi. \Voc. Ann.arY. 44.04. Tex. Code Grivn. Woe. Ann. arY. L|4.04(d) renders a

defenda^F ineligible Yor bad where Us punishment equals or exceeds 10 uears conY\nevnenY or if the defendanY has been convicted of

an offense listed under lex. Code Cflrr ^coc. An/\. art". 43.U, c oaCanCY

Tex.CoAe CriM^roc.Ann.ar-Y. 44.04 CdYIa cases where punishr/ie^l is \ess Yban \0 ^ears, Ybe Y^ial CourY has discretion Yo set bad or to deiAu it for aood cause upon belief v\\ that the defendanY w/\l\ aoY appear when the conviction became tinah or (3.\ that he w\\\ be bWeU to eonrVit another offe/\se wb\W on ball. Iik.

Code Cfivn.^roc. Ann.art MM,04CcN,

VibeA (x defendanY 'is placed on COYAvnunifa supervision no sentence has been Imposed. WorfVwvAon v. State,, So S.W.3d o45; S\4(7e^.App.300N(cd^ AnanAo V. SYoAe^S S\d.3dl 330,33/ (Tex. App. \Vn8)\ FurVberJ the sentence is \vnposed for +he birsf ti^ie when cow\vv\uaibx supervision is (evoked. Xd. Vjben a court arants shock probation under the provisions of [a^bcle] 43.IT LS^bbnJ 3e. it suspends the execution father than Yhe Imposition of the senYence, O'Hara v. S-VaYe.636 S.W, 3d S3/5S (Tex.Crlni.App. l4aM. Tn Ybese circumstances, '4he de fendant acYucdW ser\/es Ov kordion of Yhe sentence.The Canv- \cViv\Q Court fAdu then suspend the CxecovYion of the reroai'A- der of the sentence. Id.IY UlWwSj therefore^ tbat a new SenYence is YNob iraposecl or executed if the probation is re voked, \v\sbead, Yhe suspension of Yhe execuYion of fV\e senYewce \s \iffed and the defendant Continues f0 sefve his previously ordered sentence. See Xd A ou^^aWY'iona order Increases Yhe leAoYln of the Yer135\ Ia YWs case Ybe VeYvYioner was senYenced Yo ten uears Inc.arceraYlo^however h'\s sentence was suspended (x^\d ne vnxs placed On five aears comrwAnlfa Supervision o»a danuarvA ^k; 3000 in Case No.FW-2\10<\-rW. SoWquenYlvA, on November \) 3003) the ^eY\Y\oner \nola\ed \pcoWV\on ard was senbenced fo 30 roonbhs State Jail..A ^ud^evnent was entered revok'vAa W\S ^we aear coYnmuniYu oovpeM-vi5\On \v\ Case N^>. FrV^nOWW. Vlhde servina Us sevnVence fWe ^eYd'\oner was then placed on. cioWY uears sWocW ^robaf\ov\ for Case t4o.F44-3H04-M\A/ Commencing on tAaa IC/D00"o,Thereafter the YVfiYioner was released from Stcde dad on April 38,3004. On fWek 3^005, Yhe VeYifio'Aer Was COirwicYed of Stalking and senbenced do 0\ n\ne uears vncarcerabiom in Case Mo F05-0OO04-IW. On March 35y 3005 j a Vud^emenb vvas enbered fevoking Yhe YeYiYionefS shock p^obabiovA and he was sentenced bo \t{\ aears mcarcerabiou \v\ Case Uo. F44-3\10V\V\W. On Yhe sane daa. of rWcb 3S, 3005, dhe \r\al courb added a CurAuUbion order} orderiAa Case rdo. F44-St\l0ci-nvj bo r^ consecutive to Case l4o. F05~0OO0q-TW.

Tbis done even fhou&h Yhe 10 uear sentence in Case Mo. F44-

SllOVnW Wad beem p>revious>\u^ \rAposed. That sa^e da^ f[ae VflWoner filed a notice of appeal a^ Yo Case Mo. F44-3noVnVv. Tbe \ ebibionef asserts tbat be is entitled to bond p^^- dina^ appeal because Wis sentence in Case Mo. FS4-217O^-WW ^is less than ten uears1 confinevnenb. Jht Kbitloners Sentence Was \rnposed for tie. first finne on FtavewWer I, 300^,when his Community supervision Was revoked. A\ that Writhe refitioiAer beaan serv\w\ f-wne on Wis sentence. 'In tact, the Petitioner bad Served afleast ^ uears T months 33 dau^s of his original se\Afe-V\ce as evidenced o^ the fact tnaf he was \no+ placed on .shock dxobabion until fdau lb, 3003, T/vs total due. to the debaVnvnent for ^YaYe dad on tAcx^\k>, 3003 until .Aprd 3o, 3004 and all presentence hearing \d\l finoe 'HAcUdlna fr-oun September \> 3004 WMarch £5, 3005 fhe dabe of sentencing a^d addition of Yhe cumulation order with all sentences Concurrent up bo YhaY dabe. Since Yhe Vebifioner b^s already Served Wne on his senYence, bis punishment incarcerated11 is Wss tWan den uears. FurYnerrAore Yhe VeY'd^oner believes

be Was CompleYed Us ^entencefs'N dau for dau as of AuausY 34,^013. VeYibioner also beheves. pucsuaAb to the findings of •\b\s Court \v\ W\s Oricunal App\icaf\on For VJcit of lAandawus YhaY a consfifubional riabb Was violated QAd relief will be. aranted due to fhe Flea ?sarqa\\a AareevneAd Vn Case tdo. F44-^IT04-FAW- which clearL shows no cumulation order Wa^ aar^d upon on January 0G>( 3000. Therefore, the Vefitioner request that bail be set pursuant to Tex.Code Crirv^fVoc.Ann.art, 44.04

COtACLUSTOM

For the abov/e sbaVed reasons; fVtibioner respectfully requesYs YhaY YW\S honorable CourY Yo find that Ybe FetifioAer Is ella'ible bo^ bor>d ^endW\<^ appeal. ftespecYYulli^ Submibed,

{foe Trampcxs "Wvavides ^18 J3.0S3 \betaYor JVe Yi tione r t rco 3e Cleme/ifs Oi/iit S(pO\ Spur 541 AmarilU,Texas T^lOl

CF&TTFICATE OF SERVICE

T hereba eerYifu YWaV a \v\ard Judicial VvsYrlcf Court of ballas, WalUs" u

Cow\W Texas, \33 M. Riverfront loVd. 5th Floor, Dallas Texas "15301

Case ^/i^rpjvo l^^uiJL, Joe Tra^pcv's 'fceA&vide."S ^/o^0°/3> Relator / Petitioner , Pco Se

00). IVb TWt COORX OF CfclVtfttAL AWEAIS OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN TEXAS

JOE TRAWAS IsEUAMlbFS Trial Court i\k>.F44-3noq-rw TbCd-Ilo Mo.0lS\3043 delator I WH-7(b, 4o>03 GvtlFoner ^

V,

3G3rd dOblCXAl blST^ICT

COOkT OF DALLAS , DALLAS

COOUTV TEXAS HespoAtlevd.

fnOTIOU FOR UHCH WARRANT TO THE UOMOkAM JUbdE OF SAlfc COURT"

COWES FlOW , doe Trampas VAavideSjWrYdione^ j^o Se In Ybe above staled and numbered Cause and states- (Au name \S doe Trampas ^benavidesW^efitloners,^ offender dumber \s". 0184304.3.1 am competent Yo make Ybis afficlav/Y. -^ a^ presenYU w\carceraYea )v\ the qA\ Cle^e^ts Unit located at 90>O I Spur 541, Anardlo, Texas 14101. X request the Court to Issue C\ \Tar^aAf from the Dench ordering the Sheriff of t)odW County, x do transport me to the S(»3rd dudicial WisYrl^Y Court of ua11 as in Wallas Countix Texas for hear\na \wYhis maWer so Yhat I wa^ give TesYlmoAOj re^ard'»Aa appea.1 bond. HAVEk

VeY'dloner respectfully prai^S tbcd this Court grant fUs motiou and order Yhe Sheriff of Wallas County do transpo^Y ^eYiYloner Yo the bearina of thlis cause.

Wes-pecffull^ Submitted ,

Vet'.Yiofiec, Pro Sle doe Trampas Wenavlde^ ^ 181^0^3 Clements Ori'if 40>Q\ Spur 541 Amarillo/Tx. 14101

H IH TUF COURT Or CKLNIHAL AFPEAFS OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN TEXAS

•dOF TKAH^AS ^bE^AMI^S Tna\ CourV Ho.F44-anoq-nW TbCd-Ib Uo.0\&\3043 kelaYorl Wk~l6,4&l-OS CWY'dlonebYj V.

3G3fd uOblClAF blSTRICT

COOR.T OF DALLAS, DALLAS

COUNTS TEXAS Kespondent.

OW>£fc On YUs fhe daa^ of 3015, came on fo be Weard Ybe defendants Request f0f 'Wench Warrant anol after clue Cons'\de\rad\on of the sarne VV is, ORbEte^ that the Wefenda^W reauest for a hearing is (GKAUTE^u J^EHTEA^ and thab sa\cl Cause is set for heariv^ on Ybe da^ of ^30l5\and \\ is furfbe^

HI OR£>E^E\o YbaY fbe defendant's request (or be/icb warrant \S (G^AMTFb/WEHlE^i and Ybe Cled< of fbe Court notify saU iSefeadanf reaard'Wxcx Yhe WencW Warrant of the Defendant to

tbib County for sa\d driab

JUloGF PkFSlMUG

E