Benatovich v. Koessler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Benatovich v. Koessler

209 A.D.2d 983, 619 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11993

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1994

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 209 A.D.2d 983 (Benatovich v. Koessler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benatovich v. Koessler, 209 A.D.2d 983, 619 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11993 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memoran[984]*984dum: By failing to address the propriety of the order approving the Law Guardian’s fee application in his brief, plaintiff has abandoned that issue on appeal (see, Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J.—Counsel Fees.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Wesley and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memoran[984]*984dum: By failing to address the propriety of the order approving the Law Guardian’s fee application in his brief, plaintiff has abandoned that issue on appeal (see, Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J.—Counsel Fees.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Wesley and Callahan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 A.D.2d 983, 619 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benatovich-v-koessler-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack