Benarosh v. Brod

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Benarosh v. Brod

235 A.D. 801

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 801 (Benarosh v. Brod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benarosh v. Brod, 235 A.D. 801 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, not upon the ground stated at Special Term, but for the reason that it is sufficient that plaintiff was apprised, by the bill of particulars, that defendant alleged an accord and satisfaction of the causes of action set forth in the complaint by the payment of a check for $1,000 on August 3, 1931. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, not upon the ground stated at Special Term, but for the reason that it is sufficient that plaintiff was apprised, by the bill of particulars, that defendant alleged an accord and satisfaction of the causes of action set forth in the complaint by the payment of a check for $1,000 on August 3, 1931. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benarosh-v-brod-nyappdiv-1932.