Benamu v. American Honda Finance Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Benamu v. American Honda Finance Corp.

283 A.D.2d 532, 724 N.Y.S.2d 909, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5223

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 21, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D.2d 532 (Benamu v. American Honda Finance Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benamu v. American Honda Finance Corp., 283 A.D.2d 532, 724 N.Y.S.2d 909, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5223 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Wah Kwoh Lee appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated May 2, 2000, as denied his cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

[533]*533Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Supreme Court that there exist triable issues of fact which preclude the granting of the appellant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him (see, CPLR 3212 [b]). O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein, Schmidt and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Wah Kwoh Lee appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated May 2, 2000, as denied his cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

[533]*533Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Supreme Court that there exist triable issues of fact which preclude the granting of the appellant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him (see, CPLR 3212 [b]). O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein, Schmidt and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D.2d 532, 724 N.Y.S.2d 909, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benamu-v-american-honda-finance-corp-nyappdiv-2001.