Benage v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

62 N.W. 1029, 102 Mich. 79
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 26, 1895·Published

Opinions

Long, J.

This case has been reargued, and the points raised fully and carefully reconsidered.

I am unable to find anything in the cases cited or the arguments made to change my views, expressed in the iormer opinion. The ease falls so clearly within Glover v. Scotten, 82 Mich. 369, that it must be ruled by it, and I am not prepared to overrule that case.

Judgment must be affirmed.

Grant and Hooker, JJ., concurred with Long, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benage v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co., 62 N.W. 1029, 102 Mich. 79 (Mich. 1895).

62 N.W. 1029 (Benage v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glover v. Scotten
46 N.W. 936 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1890)
Sweet v. Michigan Central Railroad
49 N.W. 882 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1891)
Preston v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.
57 N.W. 31 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1893)
Noble v. St. Joseph & Benton Harbor Street Railway Co.
57 N.W. 126 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1893)