Ben-Zvi v. Zuckerman, Spaeder, Kolker, Goldstein, & Taylor, L. L. P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ben-Zvi v. Zuckerman, Spaeder, Kolker, Goldstein, & Taylor, L. L. P.

284 A.D.2d 152, 725 N.Y.S.2d 550, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5692

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 7, 2001·Published

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered July 20, 1999, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We affirm for the reasons stated in Ben-Zvi v Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman (278 AD2d 167), involving plaintiffs codefendant in the Federal criminal action underlying the instant action against plaintiffs attorneys therein, and raising issues identical to those raised in the instant action. Concur — Tom, J. P., Andrias, Ellerin, Wallach and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered July 20, 1999, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We affirm for the reasons stated in Ben-Zvi v Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman (278 AD2d 167), involving plaintiffs codefendant in the Federal criminal action underlying the instant action against plaintiffs attorneys therein, and raising issues identical to those raised in the instant action. Concur — Tom, J. P., Andrias, Ellerin, Wallach and Friedman, JJ.

Ben-Zvi v. Zuckerman, Spaeder, Kolker, Goldstein, & Taylor, L. L. P., 284 A.D.2d 152, 725 N.Y.S.2d 550, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

284 A.D.2d 152 (Ben-Zvi v. Zuckerman, Spaeder, Kolker, Goldstein, & Taylor, L. L. P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related