Ben-Zvi v. Zuckerman, Spaeder, Kolker, Goldstein, & Taylor, L. L. P.

284 A.D.2d 152, 725 N.Y.S.2d 550, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5692

This text of 284 A.D.2d 152 (Ben-Zvi v. Zuckerman, Spaeder, Kolker, Goldstein, & Taylor, L. L. P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ben-Zvi v. Zuckerman, Spaeder, Kolker, Goldstein, & Taylor, L. L. P., 284 A.D.2d 152, 725 N.Y.S.2d 550, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered July 20, 1999, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We affirm for the reasons stated in Ben-Zvi v Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman (278 AD2d 167), involving plaintiffs codefendant in the Federal criminal action underlying the instant action against plaintiffs attorneys therein, and raising issues identical to those raised in the instant action. Concur — Tom, J. P., Andrias, Ellerin, Wallach and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ben-Zvi v. Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman L. L. P.
278 A.D.2d 167 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 A.D.2d 152, 725 N.Y.S.2d 550, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ben-zvi-v-zuckerman-spaeder-kolker-goldstein-taylor-l-l-p-nyappdiv-2001.