Ben v. O'Connell
This text of 277 A.D.2d 833 (Ben v. O'Connell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Determination confirmed, without costs. Memorandum: There was substantial evidence to support the findings of the liquor authority that the petitioner violated subdivision 1 of section 65 and section 110 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. This court cannot, therefore, disturb the determination made (see Matter of Humphrey v. State Ins. Fund, 298 N. Y. 327, and Matter of Miller V. Kling, 291 N. Y. 65). The acquittal of the petitioner in the criminal proceeding did not conclude the liquor authority and was not a bar to this proceeding. (Schindler v. Royal Ins. Co., 258 N. Y. 310.) All concur. (Proceeding for review of a suspension of a liquor license.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCum, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 A.D.2d 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ben-v-oconnell-nyappdiv-1950.