Ben Kajioka v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

883 F.2d 57, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12693, 1989 WL 95403
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 20, 1989·No. 88-7391·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*58 ORDER

By order dated February 9, 1989, appellant was notified that this appeal had been selected for inclusion in the prebriefing conference program and that a telephone conference would be held on February 23, 1989. Appellant’s counsel requested that the date be changed and was instructed to confirm the new date by letter to the court and to opposing counsel. Appellant’s counsel failed to submit the confirming letter and also failed to appear at the newly scheduled conference on March 28, 1989. Appellant’s counsel also failed to respond to telephone inquiries from the Office of Conference Attorneys.

By order dated March 31, 1989, appellant was notified that another telephonic conference would be held on April 13, 1989. In this order, appellant’s counsel was expressly warned that failure to appear at the conference might result in dismissal for failure to prosecute. Appellant’s counsel again failed to appear at the scheduled conference.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ben Kajioka v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 883 F.2d 57, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12693, 1989 WL 95403 (9th Cir. 1989).

883 F.2d 57 (Ben Kajioka v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of Marya C. Young
253 F.3d 926 (Seventh Circuit, 2001)