Ben Erickson v. L.E. MacOmber and Others
This text of 204 N.W. 313 (Ben Erickson v. L.E. MacOmber and Others) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this action to recover for certain job printing, judgment was ordered for plaintiff. Defendant Macomber alone moved for amended findings or a new trial and appeals from the order denying that motion'. The only issue is whether he was a partner in an advertising venture. There is ample evidence to support the finding that he was, or at least that he held himself out, and permitted himself to be held out, to plaintiff as a partner.
The assignments of error challenging the exclusion of evidence have to do with testimony that, if admitted, could not have changed the result. That is made certain by the comment of the judge in ruling on the offer. Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 N.W. 313, 163 Minn. 514, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ben-erickson-v-le-macomber-and-others-minn-1925.