Ben Bimberg & Co. v. Unity Coat & Apron Co.
This text of 240 A.D. 959 (Ben Bimberg & Co. v. Unity Coat & Apron Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. The complaint on its face does not show that the stock of merchandise which was the subject of the transfer was not intended for resale in the regular conduct of the business of the transferor. The admissions made by plaintiffs in the affidavits on the application for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, which were especially limited to the purposes of that motion, cannot be used by defendant here. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 959, 268 N.Y.S. 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ben-bimberg-co-v-unity-coat-apron-co-nyappdiv-1933.