Bemis v. Bertram
This text of 532 P.2d 1012 (Bemis v. Bertram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alaska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
John M. Bemis admitted liability for a head-on automobile collision in which Susan Bertram was injured. After a jury trial, she was awarded $45,000.00 in damages, and her husband, Raymond Bertram, obtained a verdict of $5,000.00 for loss of consortium, time spent in nursing and care of Mrs. Bertram and damage to personal property. Bemis contends that the evidence presented at trial did not support the verdict, and that the verdicts were so grossly excessive as to shock the conscience of the court.
Viewing the evidence and inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the prevailing parties below,1 we hold that [1013]*1013the awards were not manifestly unjust, such as being the result of passion or prejudice or a disregard of the evidence or rules of law.2 Accordingly, the judgment below is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
532 P.2d 1012, 1975 Alas. LEXIS 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bemis-v-bertram-alaska-1975.