Bement v. Wyman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bement v. Wyman

301 So. 2d 471, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8575

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 1974·No. No. W-103·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion to quash service of process. We have considered the briefs and oral argument of counsel and the appellate file. The points raised on this appeal require us to assume facts which do not appear of record. Appellant not having presented a record which is sufficient [472]*472to support his contentions on appeal, the order must be affirmed. See Hall v. Davis, Fla.App.(1st), 106 So.2d 599; Wilder v. Altman, Fla.App.(3d), 179 So.2d 250.

Affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and McCORD and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion to quash service of process. We have considered the briefs and oral argument of counsel and the appellate file. The points raised on this appeal require us to assume facts which do not appear of record. Appellant not having presented a record which is sufficient [472]*472to support his contentions on appeal, the order must be affirmed. See Hall v. Davis, Fla.App.(1st), 106 So.2d 599; Wilder v. Altman, Fla.App.(3d), 179 So.2d 250.

Affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and McCORD and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Bement v. Wyman, 301 So. 2d 471, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8575 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

301 So. 2d 471 (Bement v. Wyman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related