Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bement v. Wyman

Bement v. Wyman

301 So. 2d 471, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8575
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 15, 1974
DocketNo. W-103
StatusPublished

This text of 301 So. 2d 471 (Bement v. Wyman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bement v. Wyman, 301 So. 2d 471, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8575 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion to quash service of process. We have considered the briefs and oral argument of counsel and the appellate file. The points raised on this appeal require us to assume facts which do not appear of record. Appellant not having presented a record which is sufficient [472]*472to support his contentions on appeal, the order must be affirmed. See Hall v. Davis, Fla.App.(1st), 106 So.2d 599; Wilder v. Altman, Fla.App.(3d), 179 So.2d 250.

Affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and McCORD and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilder v. Altman
179 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Hall v. Davis
106 So. 2d 599 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
301 So. 2d 471, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bement-v-wyman-fladistctapp-1974.