Belzer v. City of New York

269 A.D. 987, 58 N.Y.S.2d 278
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1945·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff as a consequence of his stepping into a hole in the pavement on Eastern Parkway, near the intersection of Rochester Avenue, Brooklyn, while alighting from a bus. Judgment for the plaintiff reversed on the law, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. The findings of fact implicit in the jury’s verdict are affirmed. The notice stated that, the claimed pavement defect existed "near the intersection of Eastern Parkway and Rochester Avenue ” without specifying in which of the three roadways on Eastern Parkway or the roadway on Rochester Avenue the claimed defect existed, or near which of the several corners the accident happened. The notice, required to be served by chapter 572 of the Laws of 1886 was fatally defective. (Chaimowitz v. City of New York, 255 App. Div. 1003.) The question of prejudice is immaterial. (Ponsrok v. City of Tankers, 254 N. Y. 91, 95; Weisman v. City of [988]*988New York, 219 N. Y. 178.) Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Belzer v. City of New York, 269 A.D. 987, 58 N.Y.S.2d 278 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

269 A.D. 987 (Belzer v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gonzales v. City of Corpus Christi
323 S.W.2d 495 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1959)
Smith v. City of New York
270 A.D. 1033 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)