Belz v. Board of Trade

Seventh Circuit

Belz v. Board of Trade

164 F.2d 824

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedDecember 23, 1947

DocketNo. 9439

StatusPublished

This text of 164 F.2d 824 (Belz v. Board of Trade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Belz v. Board of Trade, 164 F.2d 824 (7th Cir. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

MINTON, Circuit Judge.

In this case an amended complaint was dismissed on motion. From judgment of dismissal the plaintiff has appealed.

The allegations of the amended complaint parallel the allegations in Cargill, Incorporated, v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago et al., 7 Cir., 164 F.2d 820, this day decided, although in a more concise form. The averments of the plaintiff’s amended complaint charge a violation of the Sherman Act,¹ just as in the Cargill case. On the authority of that case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MINTON, Circuit Judge.

In this case an amended complaint was dismissed on motion. From judgment of dismissal the plaintiff has appealed.

The allegations of the amended complaint parallel the allegations in Cargill, Incorporated, v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago et al., 7 Cir., 164 F.2d 820, this day decided, although in a more concise form. The averments of the plaintiff’s amended complaint charge a violation of the Sherman Act,¹ just as in the Cargill case. On the authority of that case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 F.2d 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belz-v-board-of-trade-ca7-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack