Belyus v. Wilkinson, Gaddis & Co.

182 A. 873, 116 N.J.L. 92, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 188
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 31, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 182 A. 873 (Belyus v. Wilkinson, Gaddis & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Belyus v. Wilkinson, Gaddis & Co., 182 A. 873, 116 N.J.L. 92, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 188 (N.J. 1936).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Respondent’s husband, Michael Belyus, was employed by Wilkinson, Gaddis & Company as a handy man about their stables and garage. On August 4th, 1925, he suffered burns from which he died two days later. It is conceded that he met with an accident on his employer’s premises during his working hours. Appellant contends that the accident did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. Compensation was awarded by the workmen’s compensation bureau, which was reversed by the Essex Common Pleas Court, which judgment was reversed by the Supreme Court.

The testimony is necessarily meagre as no one saw the accident, but it discloses that the deceased had previously used gasoline and kerosene in his work, and this was the fluid in the bucket when the fire occurred. There was no physical evidence that deceased was engaged in anything not pertaining to his duties to his employer.

Under the testimony and reasonable presumptions arising therefrom, we conclude that the judgment of the Supreme Court should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Donges, Dear, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 7.

For reversal — Lloyd, Case, Hetfield, Wells, JJ. 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams Construction Co. v. Garrison
400 A.2d 22 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1979)
Hornyak v. the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
305 A.2d 65 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1973)
Cavalcante v. Lockheed Electronics Co.
204 A.2d 621 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1964)
Joy v. Florence Pipe Foundry Co.
165 A.2d 191 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
Pittel v. Rubin Bros. Bergen Inc.
158 A.2d 210 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
Olivera v. Hatco Chemical Co.
150 A.2d 781 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
Tocci v. Tessler & Weiss, Inc.
147 A.2d 783 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1959)
Lewis v. Walter Scott & Co., Inc.
141 A.2d 807 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
Crotty v. Driver Harris Co.
139 A.2d 126 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
Martin v. Snuffy's Steak House
134 A.2d 789 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Kozielec v. MacK Manufacturing Corp.
102 A.2d 404 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
MacKo v. Herbert Hinchman & Son
94 A.2d 690 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 A. 873, 116 N.J.L. 92, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belyus-v-wilkinson-gaddis-co-nj-1936.