Belvision, Inc. v. General Electric Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Belvision, Inc. v. General Electric Co.

46 Misc. 2d 952, 260 N.Y.S.2d 579, 2 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 942, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2024

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 22, 1965·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Where an offer explicitly states that the goods offered for sale are offered on an “as is ” basis, that all warranties are excluded, and that no modifications to the contract may be effected save by specified officers of the vendor, the exhibition of one of the items by an employee of the vendor, accompanied by said employee’s oral statement that the remainder of the goods corresponds to the “ sample ” exhibited, does not suffice to change the character of the sale from one with all warranties excluded, to a sale by sample. (American Elastics v. United States, 187 F. 2d 109, cert, den., 342 U. S. 829.) The enforcibility of a clause containing a waiver of warranties is [953]*953clear. (Freemantle v. United States Hoffman Mach. Corp., 2 A D 2d 634, 635.) Accordingly, defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the basis of its defense founded on documentary evidence, should have been granted.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and defendant’s motion for judgment dismissing the complaint granted.

Concur — Tilzer, J. P., Gold and Capozzoli, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Where an offer explicitly states that the goods offered for sale are offered on an “as is ” basis, that all warranties are excluded, and that no modifications to the contract may be effected save by specified officers of the vendor, the exhibition of one of the items by an employee of the vendor, accompanied by said employee’s oral statement that the remainder of the goods corresponds to the “ sample ” exhibited, does not suffice to change the character of the sale from one with all warranties excluded, to a sale by sample. (American Elastics v. United States, 187 F. 2d 109, cert, den., 342 U. S. 829.) The enforcibility of a clause containing a waiver of warranties is [953]*953clear. (Freemantle v. United States Hoffman Mach. Corp., 2 A D 2d 634, 635.) Accordingly, defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the basis of its defense founded on documentary evidence, should have been granted.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and defendant’s motion for judgment dismissing the complaint granted.

Concur — Tilzer, J. P., Gold and Capozzoli, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Belvision, Inc. v. General Electric Co., 46 Misc. 2d 952, 260 N.Y.S.2d 579, 2 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 942, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2024 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

46 Misc. 2d 952 (Belvision, Inc. v. General Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related