Beltz v. Garrison
98 A. 956, 254 Pa. 145, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 697
Opinion
After due consideration of all the assignments of error filed by the appellant, and the argument of learned counsel in support of them, we have not been convinced that any of them ought to be sustained, and the decree is, therefore, affirmed at appellant’s costs on the facts found and the legal conclusions reached by the learned trial judge.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beltz v. Garrison, 98 A. 956, 254 Pa. 145, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 697 (Pa. 1916).
98 A. 956 (Beltz v. Garrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Rothman
204 B.R. 143 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1996)
Solomon v. Cedar Acres East, Inc.
317 A.2d 283 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
Zalewski v. Pennsylvania Rabbit Breeders Coöperative Ass'n
76 Pa. D. & C. 225 (Adams County Court of Common Pleas, 1950)
KoEune v. State Bank of Schuylkill Haven
4 A.2d 234 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
McCay v. Luzerne & Carbon County Motor Transit Co.
189 A. 772 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Donlevy's Estate
25 Pa. D. & C. 157 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1935)
O'neill, Trustee v. Finnesey
149 A. 103 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Mitchell, Receiver of the Liberty Clay Products Co.
139 A. 853 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Perkosky v. Keystone Facing Mills Co.
5 Pa. D. & C. 613 (Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas, 1924)
Haslam v. American Auto Club, Inc.
4 Pa. D. & C. 353 (Berks County Court of Common Pleas, 1923)
Wolf v. Excelsior Automatic Scale & Supply Co.
113 A. 569 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Beltz v. Great Western Lead Mfg. Co.
251 F. 696 (D. Delaware, 1918)