Beltran v. Santa Clara County

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Beltran v. Santa Clara County. Read the opinion of the Court — 514 F.3d 906
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 17, 2007·No. 05-16976·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LORI BELTRAN; ROBERT BELTRAN;  COBY BELTRAN, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem Lori Beltran, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SANTA CLARA COUNTY; MELISSA No. 05-16976 SUAREZ, individually and as an employee of the County of Santa  D.C. No. CV-03-03767-RMW Clara; JENNIFER HUBBS, ORDER individually and as an employee of the County of Santa Clara; EMILY TJHIN, individually and as an employee of the County of Santa Clara, Defendants-Appellees.  Filed October 17, 2007

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three- judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

14131 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beltran v. Santa Clara County, (9th Cir. 2007).

Beltran v. Santa Clara County (Beltran v. Santa Clara County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.