Belton v. ABC Distributing, Inc.

978 So. 2d 237, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4779, 2008 WL 877123
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 2008·No. No. 1D08-0505·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An “Order Administratively Closing OJCC File and Dismissing Pending Petitions” was issued in this case on September 21, 2007. This order is unsigned and therefore was not properly rendered under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020(h). See Perez v. City of Tampa, 191 So.2d 302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966). The order also contains no indication that it was mailed to the parties and was not rendered under the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.180(b)(3). We therefore conclude that this order was not an appealable final order. Subsequently, the Judge of Compensation Claims issued an order which granted a motion to dismiss but this is also not a final order. See Mintz v. Broward Corr. Inst., 800 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). The instant appeal is therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DISMISSED.

ADOVANO, LEWIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Belton v. ABC Distributing, Inc., 978 So. 2d 237, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4779, 2008 WL 877123 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

978 So. 2d 237 (Belton v. ABC Distributing, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mintz v. Broward Correctional Institute
800 So. 2d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Perez v. City of Tampa
191 So. 2d 302 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)