Belton v. ABC Distributing, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Belton v. ABC Distributing, Inc.

978 So. 2d 237, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4779, 2008 WL 877123

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 3, 2008

DocketNo. 1D08-0505

StatusPublished

This text of 978 So. 2d 237 (Belton v. ABC Distributing, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Belton v. ABC Distributing, Inc., 978 So. 2d 237, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4779, 2008 WL 877123 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An “Order Administratively Closing OJCC File and Dismissing Pending Petitions” was issued in this case on September 21, 2007. This order is unsigned and therefore was not properly rendered under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020(h). See Perez v. City of Tampa, 191 So.2d 302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966). The order also contains no indication that it was mailed to the parties and was not rendered under the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.180(b)(3). We therefore conclude that this order was not an appealable final order. Subsequently, the Judge of Compensation Claims issued an order which granted a motion to dismiss but this is also not a final order. See Mintz v. Broward Corr. Inst., 800 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). The instant appeal is therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DISMISSED.

ADOVANO, LEWIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

An “Order Administratively Closing OJCC File and Dismissing Pending Petitions” was issued in this case on September 21, 2007. This order is unsigned and therefore was not properly rendered under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020(h). See Perez v. City of Tampa, 191 So.2d 302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966). The order also contains no indication that it was mailed to the parties and was not rendered under the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.180(b)(3). We therefore conclude that this order was not an appealable final order. Subsequently, the Judge of Compensation Claims issued an order which granted a motion to dismiss but this is also not a final order. See Mintz v. Broward Corr. Inst., 800 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). The instant appeal is therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DISMISSED.

ADOVANO, LEWIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

978 So. 2d 237, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4779, 2008 WL 877123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belton-v-abc-distributing-inc-fladistctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack