Belt v. State

1909 OK CR 113, 103 P. 1069, 2 Okla. Crim. 705, 1909 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 193
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided September 25, 1909·No. No. 301.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

FURMAN, Presiding Judge.

This case has been in this court since June, 1908, and has not been disposed of sooner because not reached on the docket. There are no briefs on file. There being nothing presented by brief, we have examined the record for fundamental errors. We find the information correctly drawn. The testimony fully sustains the verdict, the instructions are free from objections, and the judgment is in regular form. In fact, the case was carefully tried, and the evidence against the defendant is direct and positive. We find no error in the record The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

' DOYLE and OWEN, Judges, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Belt v. State, 1909 OK CR 113, 103 P. 1069, 2 Okla. Crim. 705, 1909 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 193 (Okla. Ct. App. 1909).

1909 OK CR 113 (Belt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hess v. State
1913 OK CR 134 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1913)
Price v. State
1911 OK CR 54 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1911)
Meeks v. State
1910 OK CR 16 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1910)