Belt v. Port of New York Authority

227 N.E.2d 397, 19 N.Y.2d 850, 280 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1555
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 20, 1967
StatusPublished

This text of 227 N.E.2d 397 (Belt v. Port of New York Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Belt v. Port of New York Authority, 227 N.E.2d 397, 19 N.Y.2d 850, 280 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1555 (N.Y. 1967).

Opinion

In each action: Judgment affirmed, with costs to plaintiff against defendant Broadway Maintenance Corporation; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Fgld and Judges Burke, Soileppi, Keating and Breitel. Judges Van Voorhis and Bergan dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the complaint against defendant, the Port of New York Authority, and to dismiss, as academic, the cross claim of defendant Port of New York Authority against W. J. Barney Corporation and the third-party complaint of W. J. Barney Corporation against Broadway Maintenance Corporation for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 N.E.2d 397, 19 N.Y.2d 850, 280 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belt-v-port-of-new-york-authority-ny-1967.