Belt v. Fort Peck Tribes

11 Am. Tribal Law 287
CourtFort Peck Appellate Court
DecidedJanuary 13, 2012
DocketNo. 585
StatusPublished

This text of 11 Am. Tribal Law 287 (Belt v. Fort Peck Tribes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Fort Peck Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Belt v. Fort Peck Tribes, 11 Am. Tribal Law 287 (ftpeckctapp 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter comes before the Fort Peck Court of Appeals on a Petition for Review filed by Appellant, Merrilee Belt, pro se. No response was filed by the Fort Peck Tribes.

The Petition asks this Court to enforce an Order issued by the Fort Peck Tribal Court, Honorable Judge Roxanne Gour-neau presiding, on September 15, 2011. The Order granted permanent legal custody of Appellant’s child to her. The Petitioner states that the Fort Peck Tribes, Child and Family Services office, refuses to comply with the Order.

This Court’s jurisdiction is limited to reviewing de novo all determination of the Tribal Court on matters of law, but we may not set aside factual determinations of the Tribal Court if supported by substantial evidence II CCOJ 202.

There is no issue of review here, as the Petitioner requests enforcement of an Order. That being the case, we have no jurisdiction at the present time.

THEREFORE, IT IS THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that the matter be, and the same is hereby remanded to the Fort Peck Tribal Court for appropriate remedy. The Court may consider the issuance of an [288]*288Order to Show Cause directed to Child and Family Services to resolve the matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Am. Tribal Law 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belt-v-fort-peck-tribes-ftpeckctapp-2012.