Belsome v. Burks

Fourth Circuit

Belsome v. Burks

584 F. App'x 156

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 10, 2014

DocketNo. 14-1028

StatusPublished

This text of 584 F. App'x 156 (Belsome v. Burks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Belsome v. Burks, 584 F. App'x 156 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the district court’s order denying a motion to lift the stay imposed in the underlying Receivership. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no abuse of discretion by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Belsome v. Burks, No. 3:12-cv-00800-GCM (W.D.N.C. Dec. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the district court’s order denying a motion to lift the stay imposed in the underlying Receivership. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no abuse of discretion by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Belsome v. Burks, No. 3:12-cv-00800-GCM (W.D.N.C. Dec. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

584 F. App'x 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belsome-v-burks-ca4-2014.