Belrose Realty Co. v. Maier

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Belrose Realty Co. v. Maier

144 N.Y.S. 320

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 144 N.Y.S. 320 (Belrose Realty Co. v. Maier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Belrose Realty Co. v. Maier, 144 N.Y.S. 320 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a final order in summary proceedings removing her as a squatter from possession of a toilet room in the rear of premises demised by her.

The terms of the lease indicate that use of the toilet room by the defendant as appurtenant of the premises occupied by her was plainly contemplated. As the provisions of section 2232 of the Code of Civil Procedure do not apply to such a case, the order was improperly made, and must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a final order in summary proceedings removing her as a squatter from possession of a toilet room in the rear of premises demised by her.

The terms of the lease indicate that use of the toilet room by the defendant as appurtenant of the premises occupied by her was plainly contemplated. As the provisions of section 2232 of the Code of Civil Procedure do not apply to such a case, the order was improperly made, and must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 N.Y.S. 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belrose-realty-co-v-maier-nyappterm-1913.