Beloate v. Smith

204 S.W.2d 908, 212 Ark. 39, 1947 Ark. LEXIS 636
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 13, 1947
Docket4-8256
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 204 S.W.2d 908 (Beloate v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beloate v. Smith, 204 S.W.2d 908, 212 Ark. 39, 1947 Ark. LEXIS 636 (Ark. 1947).

Opinion

Robins, J.

Examination of the transcript discloses that there has been no final judgment or other appeal-able order in this case. Begun as an ejectment suit by W. E. Beloate as executor and devisee of S. R. Beloate, deceased, it was transferred to the chancery court on motion of appellee Tizzie Smith, who was the original defendant below.

Two orders made below (in addition to order transferring the cause to equity) are shown in the transcript.

One of these is an order eliminating from the complaint W. E. Beloate as executor. This order was not a final one, because W. E. Beloate, individually, was the real party in interest and his rights were in no manner affected by the executor being removed from the litigation.

The other order was one sustaining the motion of appellee to strike an amendment to the complaint. This amendment in reality was a statement of legal conclusions which appellant sought to have drawn from the evidence, and, if these conclusions were justified, the chancery court on final hearing might, in the absence of such amendment, have treated the complaint as having been amended to conform to the proof. After this amendment was stricken appellant’s original complaint still remained for disposal. Therefore, this order was not final or appealable.

Since the lower court has made no final order in this case, it is not properly here. Reynolds v. Craycraft, 26 Ark. 468; Lee v. Black, 27 Ark. 336; Davis v. Hale, 114 Ark. 426, 170 S. W. 99, Ann. Cas. 1916D, 701; Durben v. Montgomery, 144 Ark. 153, 221 S. W. 855, 223 S. W. 17; Harvey v. Marr, 173 Ark. 90, 291 S. W. 981.

The motion of appellees to dismiss the appeal will, therefore, be sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wicker v. Wicker
265 S.W.2d 6 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1954)
Beloate v. Smith
218 S.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 S.W.2d 908, 212 Ark. 39, 1947 Ark. LEXIS 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beloate-v-smith-ark-1947.