Belmudes v. Social Security Administration

District Court, E.D. Arkansas·Decided July 19, 2021·No. 4:20-cv-00445·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION

JESSICA BELMUDES PLAINTIFF

V. No. 4:20-CV-445-JTR

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner Social Security Administration1 DEFENDANT

ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Jessica Belmudes’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). Doc. 23. The Commissioner has not objected or otherwise responded to the Motion, and the time to do so has passed. Plaintiff’s attorney, Stephanie Bartels Wallace, requests a total award of $6,750.32 (which sum includes 30.25 attorney hours incurred in 2020–21 at an hourly rate of $206; 6.65 paralegal hours at an hourly rate of $75; and expenses of $20.07). The Court concludes that Plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees under the EAJA and that the requested sum is reasonable.

1 On July 9, 2021, Kilolo Kijakazi became the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and is substituted as the Defendant in this action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney’s Fees pursuant to the EAJA (Doc. 23) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded $6,750.32 in fees and expenses under the EAJA.? SO ORDERED, this 19th day of July, 2021.

am STATES MAGISFRATE JUDGE

? Consistent with the Commissioner’s usual procedure in light of Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the check awarding EAJA fees should be made payable to Plaintiff but mailed to the Plaintiff in care of Plaintiffs attorney at the attorney’s office.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Belmudes v. Social Security Administration, (E.D. Ark. 2021).

Belmudes v. Social Security Administration (Belmudes v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)