Belmont Iron Works v. Pacific Coast Direct Line, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Belmont Iron Works v. Pacific Coast Direct Line, Inc.

246 A.D. 586, 284 N.Y.S. 365

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Belmont Iron Works v. Pacific Coast Direct Line, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 249 A.D. 156 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

The first cause of action is to recover alleged overcharges for transporting structural steel from Chester, Pa., to Hawaiian Islands, with a transshipment at San Francisco. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the first cause of action unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The first cause of action is to recover alleged overcharges for transporting structural steel from Chester, Pa., to Hawaiian Islands, with a transshipment at San Francisco. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the first cause of action unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Belmont Iron Works v. Pacific Coast Direct Line, Inc., 246 A.D. 586, 284 N.Y.S. 365 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

246 A.D. 586 (Belmont Iron Works v. Pacific Coast Direct Line, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.