Belmar Watch Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Belmar Watch Co. v. United States

26 Cust. Ct. 312, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 733

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 21, 1950

DocketNo. 55026; protests 158702-K, etc. (Philadelphia)

StatusPublished

This text of 26 Cust. Ct. 312 (Belmar Watch Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Belmar Watch Co. v. United States, 26 Cust. Ct. 312, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 733 (cusc 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the appraisement of the merchandise and the liquidation of the entries were made in the same manner, under facts and circumstances the same in all material respects, as the appraisement and liquidation in The Gruen Watch Company v. United States (24 Cust. Ct. 101, C. D. 1216). In accordance with stipulation and following the cited authority the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. It was further held that a legal liquidation should be had which would form the basis for a protest in which, should they so desire, the importers may litigate any questions presented by such action under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the appraisement of the merchandise and the liquidation of the entries were made in the same manner, under facts and circumstances the same in all material respects, as the appraisement and liquidation in The Gruen Watch Company v. United States (24 Cust. Ct. 101, C. D. 1216). In accordance with stipulation and following the cited authority the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. It was further held that a legal liquidation should be had which would form the basis for a protest in which, should they so desire, the importers may litigate any questions presented by such action under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 Cust. Ct. 312, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belmar-watch-co-v-united-states-cusc-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack