Belluso v. Hall

335 S.E.2d 884, 176 Ga. App. 281, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 2412
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 12, 1985
Docket70409
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 335 S.E.2d 884 (Belluso v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Belluso v. Hall, 335 S.E.2d 884, 176 Ga. App. 281, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 2412 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Appellee, a practicing attorney, brought suit against appellants alleging they failed to pay his fees. Following a jury trial during which appellants represented themselves, a verdict was returned in favor of appellee. Judgment was entered upon the verdict and now through counsel this appeal was taken. Held:

Appellants’ enumerations of error only address evidentiary matters. Assuming, arguendo, the trial court erred in admitting the evidence in question, such errors were waived by appellants’ failure to interpose timely objections. Page v. State, 167 Ga. App. 297, 298 (1) (306 SE2d 381).

Judgment affirmed.

Banke, C. J., and Benham, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morris v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company
348 S.E.2d 573 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
335 S.E.2d 884, 176 Ga. App. 281, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 2412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belluso-v-hall-gactapp-1985.