Bellow v. State of Nevada
This text of Bellow v. State of Nevada (Bellow v. State of Nevada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 Armanna J. Bellow, Case No. 2:25-cv-00024-DJA 6 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 State of Nevada, 9 Defendant. 10 11 Before the Court are two of pro se Plaintiff Armanna J. Bellow’s motions for default 12 judgment (ECF Nos. 12, 15) and motion for entry of Clerk’s default (ECF No. 16). The Court 13 denies Plaintiff’s motions because Plaintiff has not properly served Defendant the State of 14 Nevada. See Marty v. Green, No. 2:10-CV-01823, 2011 WL 320303, at *4 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 15 2011) (stating that the court would have denied motion for default because defendants had not 16 been properly served). A default judgment is void where a defendant has not been properly 17 served. Mason v. Genisco Tech. Corp., 960 F.2d 849, 851 (9th Cir. 1992) (default judgment is 18 void where defendant was not properly served); Olson v. Nevada, No. 3:23-CV-00513-ART- 19 CLB, 2025 WL 1211037, at *1 (D. Nev. Apr. 25, 2025). 20 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(j)(2), a Plaintiff may effectuate service in two 21 ways: 22 A state, a municipal corporation, or any other state-created governmental organization that is subject to suit must be served by: 23 24 (A) delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to its chief executive officer; or 25 (B) serving a copy of each in the manner prescribed by that state’s 26 law for serving a summons or like process on such a defendant 27 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (emphasis added). 1 Thus, Plaintiff can properly serve the State of Nevada by either complying with Federal 2 Rule of Civil Procedure 4(j)(2)(A), or by complying with state law requirements for service of 3 process on the state, outlined below. 4 Nevada Revised Statute 41.031(2) provides that: 5 An action against the State of Nevada must be filed in the county where the cause or some part thereof arose or in Carson City. In an 6 action against the State of Nevada, the summons and a copy of the 7 complaint must be served upon: 8 (a) The Attorney General, or a person designated by the Attorney General, at the Office of the Attorney General in Carson City; and 9 (b) The person serving in the office of administrative head of the 10 named agency 11 12 NRS 41.031(2) (emphasis added). 13 Rule 4.2(d)(1) of the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure provides nearly identical 14 requirements for service of process: 15 The State and any public entity of the State must be served by 16 delivering a copy of the summons and complaint to: 17 (A) the Attorney General, or a person designated by the Attorney General to receive service of process, at the Office of the Attorney 18 General in Carson City; and 19 (B) the person serving in the office of administrative head of the named public entity, or an agent designated by the administrative 20 head to receive service of process. 21 22 Nev. R. Civ. P. 4.2(d)(1) (emphasis added). 23 Additionally, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(2) requires that a “person who is at 24 least 18 years old and not a party” serve the summons and complaint. That Rule does not 25 contemplate service by first class mail. The same is true of the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure. 26 See Nev. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). 27 Here, Plaintiff’s proofs of service only indicate that Plaintiff served the State of Nevada 1 18 years old and not a party delivered the summons and complaint to the persons identified in 2 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(j)(2)(A), Nevada Revised Statute 41.031(2), or Nevada Rule of 3 Civil Procedure 4.2(d)(1). So, the Court will deny Plaintiff’s motions for default. The Court will 4 further give Plaintiff an additional sixty days to serve the State of Nevada. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 4(m). 6 7 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions for default (ECF Nos. 12, 15, 8 16) are denied. 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until October 8, 2025, to 10 accomplish service. 11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is kindly directed to send a copy of 12 this order to Plaintiff. 13 14 DATED: July 11, 2025 15 DANIEL J. ALBREGTS 16 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bellow v. State of Nevada, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bellow-v-state-of-nevada-nvd-2025.