Bellon v. State

351 S.W.3d 798, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1200, 2011 WL 4036467
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 13, 2011·No. ED 95685·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brian C. Bellon (Movant) appeals from the trial court’s order denying his fourth Rule 75.01 motion to reopen his post-conviction proceedings (Motion). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bellon v. State, 351 S.W.3d 798, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1200, 2011 WL 4036467 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

351 S.W.3d 798 (Bellon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Gray
351 S.W.3d 798 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)