Bellon v. State

195 S.W.3d 19, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 946, 2006 WL 1736347
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 27, 2006
DocketED 86585
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 195 S.W.3d 19 (Bellon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bellon v. State, 195 S.W.3d 19, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 946, 2006 WL 1736347 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Brian C. Bellon, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Taylor
195 S.W.3d 19 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 S.W.3d 19, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 946, 2006 WL 1736347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bellon-v-state-moctapp-2006.