Bellochi v. Andrews

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bellochi v. Andrews

505 So. 2d 506, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 794, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7281

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 19, 1987

DocketNo. 86-546

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 505 So. 2d 506 (Bellochi v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bellochi v. Andrews, 505 So. 2d 506, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 794, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7281 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

Joseph F. Bellochi and his wife, Lucy, appeal from an order which awarded appel-lee/cross-appellant, Robert James Andrews, the sum of $33,000 and the Bellochis $13,000 in an action involving the alleged breach of a home construction contract. On appeal the Bellochis contend that the trial court erred in the amount of damages awarded to Andrews and in failing to award them attorney’s fees. Andrews cross-appeals, claiming that the trial court erred in failing to allow him foreclosure of his mechanic’s lien, prejudgment interest, costs and attorney’s fees.

We find no error except for the trial court’s dual judgments — only one judgment in favor of Andrews for the sum of $20,000 should have been entered — and the trial court should have allowed prejudgment interest on that amount from October 26, 1984, at the 12% statutory rate. See Peter Marich & Associates, Inc. v. Powell, 365 So.2d 754 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, J., and HARRIS, C.M., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COBB, Judge.

Joseph F. Bellochi and his wife, Lucy, appeal from an order which awarded appel-lee/cross-appellant, Robert James Andrews, the sum of $33,000 and the Bellochis $13,000 in an action involving the alleged breach of a home construction contract. On appeal the Bellochis contend that the trial court erred in the amount of damages awarded to Andrews and in failing to award them attorney’s fees. Andrews cross-appeals, claiming that the trial court erred in failing to allow him foreclosure of his mechanic’s lien, prejudgment interest, costs and attorney’s fees.

We find no error except for the trial court’s dual judgments — only one judgment in favor of Andrews for the sum of $20,000 should have been entered — and the trial court should have allowed prejudgment interest on that amount from October 26, 1984, at the 12% statutory rate. See Peter Marich & Associates, Inc. v. Powell, 365 So.2d 754 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, J., and HARRIS, C.M., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

505 So. 2d 506, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 794, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bellochi-v-andrews-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack