Bello v. United States

138 S. Ct. 1976, 201 L. Ed. 2d 237
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 14, 2018·No. No. 16–7667.·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari as to Daniel G. Bello, Fidel Flores, Jose S. Olivarez, Rudy Martinez-Castillo, Lugardo Vazquez-Hernandez, Angel D. Sanabia-Sanchez, Lino I. Carrillo-Hernandez, and Hector A. Cabrera are granted. The judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Sessions v. Dimaya, 584 U.S ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018). The petition for writ of certiorari as to Genaro Mayorga-Salazar, Marion A. Amaya-Guerrero, Rudith V. Guerreroraniva, Tito Olvera-Castro, Carlos Trejo-Dominguez, Evaristo Reyes-Diaz, and Francisco D. Trevino-Rodriguez is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bello v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 1976, 201 L. Ed. 2d 237 (U.S. 2018).

138 S. Ct. 1976 (Bello v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Winters v. United States
D. South Dakota, 2019
Dota v. United States
368 F. Supp. 3d 1354 (C.D. California, 2018)
United States v. Hernandez-Lara
904 F.3d 866 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)
United States v. Antonio Blackstone
903 F.3d 1020 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)