Bello v. Holyoke Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of Salem
This text of 382 So. 2d 1272 (Bello v. Holyoke Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of Salem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A review of the record demonstrates that the trial court correctly determined that appellee, Holyoke Mutual Fire Insurance Company, was entitled to summary judgment in its favor, as a matter of law; there were no genuine issues of material fact left unresolved. See Midwest Mutual Insurance Company v. Santiesteban, 287 So.2d 665 (Fla.1973); Sandron Corporation v. Utica Mutual Insurance Company, 360 So.2d 477 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); U.S. Liability Insurance Company v. Bove, 347 So.2d 678 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Stewart v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, 316 So.2d 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
382 So. 2d 1272, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bello-v-holyoke-mutual-fire-insurance-co-of-salem-fladistctapp-1980.