Bello v. Holyoke Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of Salem

382 So. 2d 1272, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23679
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 15, 1980
DocketNo. 79-689
StatusPublished

This text of 382 So. 2d 1272 (Bello v. Holyoke Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of Salem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bello v. Holyoke Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of Salem, 382 So. 2d 1272, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23679 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A review of the record demonstrates that the trial court correctly determined that appellee, Holyoke Mutual Fire Insurance Company, was entitled to summary judgment in its favor, as a matter of law; there were no genuine issues of material fact left unresolved. See Midwest Mutual Insurance Company v. Santiesteban, 287 So.2d 665 (Fla.1973); Sandron Corporation v. Utica Mutual Insurance Company, 360 So.2d 477 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); U.S. Liability Insurance Company v. Bove, 347 So.2d 678 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Stewart v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, 316 So.2d 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Midwest Mutual Insurance Company v. Santiesteban
287 So. 2d 665 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
US Liability Ins. Co. v. Bove
347 So. 2d 678 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Sandron Corp. v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co.
360 So. 2d 477 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Stewart v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company
316 So. 2d 598 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
382 So. 2d 1272, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bello-v-holyoke-mutual-fire-insurance-co-of-salem-fladistctapp-1980.