Bello-Gallegos v. United States
This text of 56 F. App'x 411 (Bello-Gallegos v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Federal prisoner Arnulfo Bello-Gallegos appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We review de novo. United States v. Day, 285 F.3d 1167,1169 (9th Cir.2002).
Bello-Gallegos’s § 2255 petition is untimely. The petition to revoke supervised release does not reinitiate the limitations period of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The one-year period applies and there are no applicable exceptions.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F. App'x 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bello-gallegos-v-united-states-ca9-2003.