Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bello-Espinosa v. Christiansen

Bello-Espinosa v. Christiansen

679 So. 2d 1201, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8059, 1996 WL 426389
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 31, 1996
DocketNo. 96-0509
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 679 So. 2d 1201 (Bello-Espinosa v. Christiansen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bello-Espinosa v. Christiansen, 679 So. 2d 1201, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8059, 1996 WL 426389 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to seek review on plenary appeal. George J. Karr, D.D.S., P.A, v. Sellers, 620 So.2d 1104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

DELL, FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Siegel
679 So. 2d 1201 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
679 So. 2d 1201, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8059, 1996 WL 426389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bello-espinosa-v-christiansen-fladistctapp-1996.