Bellini Construction Co., Inc. v. Zoning Board of Review of the Town of Smithfield

14 A.3d 225, 2011 R.I. LEXIS 33, 2011 WL 941163
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedMarch 17, 2011
Docket2010-69-APPEAL
StatusPublished

This text of 14 A.3d 225 (Bellini Construction Co., Inc. v. Zoning Board of Review of the Town of Smithfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bellini Construction Co., Inc. v. Zoning Board of Review of the Town of Smithfield, 14 A.3d 225, 2011 R.I. LEXIS 33, 2011 WL 941163 (R.I. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

This case came before this court in conference pursuant to Article I, Rule 12A(3)(b) of the Supreme Court Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the record and the parties’ prebriefing statements, we proceed to decide the case at this time without further briefing or argument.

The plaintiff, Bellini Construction Co., Inc., has appealed from a Superior Court judgment affirming a decision of the Smithfield Zoning Board of Review. However, we do not reach the merits of this appeal because the plaintiff has not properly invoked the jurisdiction of this court. The proper procedure to review a judgment of the Superior Court on appeal from a decision of a zoning board is by petition for writ of certiorari. There is no right of appeal to this court. See AV Realty, LLC v. Smithfield Zoning Board of Review, 762 A.2d 803 (R.I.2000) (mem.); Blackstone Park Improvement Association v. State Board of Standards and Appeals, 448 A.2d 1233, 1241 n. 6 (R.I.1982); Hardy v. Zoning Board of Review of Coventry, 119 R.I. 533, 382 A.2d 520 (1977); see also Bassi v. Zoning Board of Review of Providence, 107 R.I. 702, 271 A.2d 210 (1970). “Neither the current statute, [G.L.1956] § 45-24-69, nor its predecessor, § 45-24-20, provides for any appeal to the Supreme Court from a Superior Court judgment on an appeal from a decision of a zoning board of review.” Gabriele v. Rocchio, 665 A.2d 566, 566 (R.I.1995). Because the plaintiff has filed a notice of appeal, rather than a petition for writ of certiorari, this matter is not properly before this court.

Accordingly, the plaintiffs appeal is dismissed. The papers of the case may be remanded to the Superior Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hardy v. ZONING BD. OF REVIEW, ETC.
382 A.2d 520 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1977)
Blackstone Park Improvement Ass'n v. State Board of Standards & Appeals
448 A.2d 1233 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1982)
Bassi v. Zoning Bd. of Review of City of Providence
271 A.2d 210 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1970)
Gabriele v. Rocchio
665 A.2d 566 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1995)
AV Realty, LLC v. Smithfield Zoning Board of Review
762 A.2d 803 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 A.3d 225, 2011 R.I. LEXIS 33, 2011 WL 941163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bellini-construction-co-inc-v-zoning-board-of-review-of-the-town-of-ri-2011.