Bellingham v. Smith

Suffolk County Court

Bellingham v. Smith

1 Rec. Co. Ct. 248

CourtNew York County Court, Suffolk County

DecidedApril 29, 1673

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Rec. Co. Ct. 248 (Bellingham v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York County Court, Suffolk County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bellingham v. Smith, 1 Rec. Co. Ct. 248 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1673).

Pincite

Opinion

M* John Oxenbridge mr James Allen & mr Anthony Stoddard Execute*3 to the late Richard Bellingham Esq* his will, having an action depending in Court against Leif* John Smith of Winnisimmett: The Dep* Gov* declared in open Court his dissent from m* Whartons being an Attourny to the saide Smith (who did in open Court declare that m* Wharton was the cause of the action) the person viz* m* Wharton being one under bonds of good behaviour.

[See above, pp. 228-31, 237-8, 240-41.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M* John Oxenbridge mr James Allen & mr Anthony Stoddard Execute*3 to the late Richard Bellingham Esq* his will, having an action depending in Court against Leif* John Smith of Winnisimmett: The Dep* Gov* declared in open Court his dissent from m* Whartons being an Attourny to the saide Smith (who did in open Court declare that m* Wharton was the cause of the action) the person viz* m* Wharton being one under bonds of good behaviour.

[See above, pp. 228-31, 237-8, 240-41.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Rec. Co. Ct. 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bellingham-v-smith-nysuffolkctyct-1673.