Bellinger v. Town of Salisbury

278 A.D. 631, 102 N.Y.S.2d 385, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4143
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 24, 1951·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: Defendant was entitled to inquire of plaintiff Bellinger on cross-examination whether he had received any moneys from Yurkewicz or any of his representatives or attorneys.” It was material on the question of damages. (Knapp v. Boche, 94 N. Y. 329; An ¿merman V. Utilities Oil Gorp., 222 App. Div. 481.) Exclusion of the evidence under the circumstances presents reversible error. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in a negligence action. The order denied a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bellinger v. Town of Salisbury, 278 A.D. 631, 102 N.Y.S.2d 385, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

278 A.D. 631 (Bellinger v. Town of Salisbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Livant v. Livant
18 A.D.2d 383 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)