Bellinger v. Lindsey

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bellinger v. Lindsey

510 S.W.3d 359, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 389, 2017 WL 405801

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 31, 2017·No. No. ED 103703·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Patrick Bellinger appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his petition for declaratory judgment, permanent injunction, abatement of nuisances, removal of encroachments, and damages against Keith and Olivia Lindsey, owners of property within a subdivision being developed by Mr. Bellinger. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We deny appellant’s motion to strike respondents’ brief. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Patrick Bellinger appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his petition for declaratory judgment, permanent injunction, abatement of nuisances, removal of encroachments, and damages against Keith and Olivia Lindsey, owners of property within a subdivision being developed by Mr. Bellinger. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We deny appellant’s motion to strike respondents’ brief. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Bellinger v. Lindsey, 510 S.W.3d 359, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 389, 2017 WL 405801 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

510 S.W.3d 359 (Bellinger v. Lindsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.