Bellinger v. Glenn, Brockway & Co.

80 Ala. 190
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 80 Ala. 190 (Bellinger v. Glenn, Brockway & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bellinger v. Glenn, Brockway & Co., 80 Ala. 190 (Ala. 1885).

Opinion

COLOPTON, J.

To give a right of action for a tort, the act complained of must be wrong in itself, or become so by reason of the consequences which ensue. With whatever intent an act may be done, it can not be the foundation of an action, unless it constitutes a legal injury. “Whatever one has a right to do, another can have no right to complain of.” The waiver of protest and notice applied only to the drawers and endorsers. It conferred no right on the plaintiffs, who had not accepted the bill and were not parties to it, and imposed no duty on tbe defendants as to them. It is lawful for the holder of a bill, notwithstanding protest may be waived, to have it protested, if he deems such advisable, or desires to claim the statutory damages for non-acceptance or non-payment. On the allegations of the complaint, the protest was not a wrong to the plaintiffs, could not have done them any damage, and gave them no right of action. The substantial elements of a cause of action — wrong and damage — are wanting.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doyle v. First National Bank
131 Ala. 294 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1901)
White v. Keith
97 Ala. 668 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1892)
Eslava v. Jones
83 Ala. 139 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 Ala. 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bellinger-v-glenn-brockway-co-ala-1885.