Bellesky v. Gronholz
This text of 133 N.Y.S. 1112 (Bellesky v. Gronholz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants. The mother of the plaintiff testified that glass from a window on the first or second floor of the premises No. 206 East Tenth street, borough of Manhattan, fell and struck the plaintiff. In their answer the defendants admitted that they owned the premises referred to, but denied that these premises were under their control. The evidence offered was insufficient to prove negligence on the part of the defendants, or to establish any fact from which negligence could properly be inferred. Margulies v. Beck, 130 N. Y. Supp. 159. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 N.Y.S. 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bellesky-v-gronholz-nyappterm-1912.