Beller v. State

160 S.W.3d 587, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5793, 2005 WL 171325
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Beller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 228
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 26, 2005·No. No. 10-02-00282-CR·Published

Opinion

[588]*588DISSENTING OPINION TO ABATEMENT ORDER OF DECEMBER 1, 2004, ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TOM GRAY, Chief Justice.

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion to the order withdrawing the judgment and opinion on petition for discretionary review, the Court lacks jurisdiction to issue an abatement order. See Better v. State, No. 10-02-00282-CR, 2004 WL 3015320, at *1, 2004 Tex.App. LEXIS 10354, at *4 (Tex.App.-Waco Dec. 29, 2004, order) (per curiam) (Gray, C.J., dissenting). Accordingly, I dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beller v. State, 160 S.W.3d 587, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5793, 2005 WL 171325 (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

160 S.W.3d 587 (Beller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.