Beller v. City of New York

269 A.D. 642, 58 N.Y.S.2d 112
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 2, 1945
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 269 A.D. 642 (Beller v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beller v. City of New York, 269 A.D. 642, 58 N.Y.S.2d 112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The law is well settled that a cause of action will lie for an unauthorized autopsy. (Grawunder v. Beth Israel Hospital Assn., 242 App. Div. 56, affd. 266 N. Y. 605; Darcy v. Presbyterian Hospital, 202 N. Y. 259.) In the absence of a testamentary disposition, the right to the possession of the. body of one who has died belongs to the surviving husband or wife or next of kin for the purpose of preservation and burial. Anyone infringing upon such right by mutilating the remains without the consent of the person or persons entitled to the posséssion thereof may be required to pay damages for the injury to the feelings and for mental suffering resulting from such unlawful act, even though no pecuniary damage is alleged or proved. (Darcy v. Presbyterian Hospital, supra, 262.)

[644]*644Upon the record in this case we think that the trial court erred in directing a verdict for defendant. Whether there was an unnecessary mutilation of the remains of the deceased by defendant here, and if so, whether such act was committed without the authorization of the deceased’s next of kin, and what damages, if any, plaintiffs sustained, are issues of fact which should have been left to the jury for determination.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kellogg v. Office of Chief Medical Examiner
189 Misc. 2d 756 (New York Supreme Court, 2001)
Slaughter v. St. Anthony Community Hospital
206 A.D.2d 513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Bambrick v. Booth Memorial Medical Center
190 A.D.2d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Bambrick v. Booth Memorial Medical Center
148 Misc. 2d 688 (New York Supreme Court, 1990)
Jackson v. Rupp
228 So. 2d 916 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Hendriksen v. Roosevelt Hospital
297 F. Supp. 1142 (S.D. New York, 1969)
French v. Ochsner Clinic
200 So. 2d 371 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1967)
Kalina v. General Hospital of the City of Syracuse
18 A.D.2d 757 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Murphy v. New York State Thruway Authority
23 Misc. 2d 1078 (New York State Court of Claims, 1960)
Brown v. Broome County
10 A.D.2d 152 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Trammell v. City of New York
193 Misc. 356 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D. 642, 58 N.Y.S.2d 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beller-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1945.